Re: Triple/quadruple/pentuple better than dual?

That would be an interesting experiment-one group does dual n back and
another group splits the time between doing visual and then audio
single back.

On May 17, 12:46 pm, whoisbambam <smath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gwern,
>
> i dont follow.
>
> single nback can be better than dual nback?
>
> so, one should practice visual nback and then audio nback, maximizing
> effort in each independently?
>
> i certainly didnt know this to be true if it is...........
>
> On May 16, 3:25 pm, Gwern Branwen <gwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:47 PM, D <damian.amen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What has been thought about the relative success people have with tri/
> > > quad/pent-n back in comparison with dual n-back?
>
> > > Is it sensible to pursue the 'broader' levels and simply ditch dual n-
> > > back? I would think that dual n-back is inferior to the other modes
> > > since they involve the stimuli of DNB and more.
>
> > We don't know. The FAQ covershttp://www.gwern.net/N-back%20FAQ#jaeggi-2010whichfound Single
> > N-Back better than Dual N-Back.
>
> > --
> > gwernhttp://www.gwern.net

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dual N-Back, Brain Training & Intelligence" group.
To post to this group, send email to brain-training@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to brain-training+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training?hl=en.